Nuclear 'spike' found in Russia's Ural Mountains

High levels of Ruthenium-106, previously linked to nuclear weapons testing, are suspected to have come from a reprocessing plant.

The area in the Urals near where the radiation leak is said to have originated
Image: The area in the Urals near where the radiation leak is said to have originated
Why you can trust Sky News

There has been a spike in radioactivity coming from Russia's Ural Mountains, it has been confirmed.

It is suspected to come from a nuclear fuel reprocessing plant, but the facility has denied it is the source.

A cloud of Ruthenium-106 was detected across 28 European countries between 27 September and 13 October, at trace levels.

Russia's Meteorological Service has since said that it had recorded a release of Ruthenium-106 in the southern part of the range the divides Europe and Asia in late September.

It described the level as one that would have resulted in an "extremely high contamination".

Russia's state-controlled Rosatom corporation said in a statement that there had been no radiation leak from its Mayak plant.

Mayak said in a statement the plant has not conducted any work extracting Ruthenium-106 from spent nuclear fuel "for several years".

More on Russia

The Russian meteorological office's report, however, said the levels of radiation in residential areas surrounding the facility in the Chelyabinsk region were "high" for spent nuclear fuel.

Air samples in the town of Argayash in late September and early October showed levels nearly 1,000 times higher than those recorded in the previous months.

A graphic by France's nuclear safety agency showing  the percentage likelihood of the release's origin
Image: A graphic by France's nuclear safety agency showing the percentage likelihood of the release's origin

France's nuclear safety agency, The Institute for Radioprotection and Nuclear Safety. had worked out that the radiation most likely originated in the Urals but was spread at high levels across large areas of European Russia.

It said the release would have posed no health or environmental risks to people in European countries outside Russia.

But it added that food would have been contaminated at above maximum permitted levels of radiation for tens of kilometres from the point of origin.

The French report said: "The detection of Ruthenium-106 alone excludes the possibility of a release from a nuclear reactor which would result in the presence of other radionuclides. The origin of Ruthenium-106 is therefore to be found either in nuclear fuel cycle facilities or radioactive source production."

Mayak has been responsible for at least two of Russia's worst nuclear accidents.

In 2004, waste from the plant was dumped in the local Techa River.

In 2016, journalists from the Associated Press visited a village downriver from Mayak where doctors have recorded chromosomal abnormalities, birth defects and cancers at rates much higher than the Russian average.

The Russian Academy of Sciences' Nuclear Safety Institute, which oversees safety standards, has insisted that Mayak's nuclear waste processing system poses no danger to people living nearby

Greenpeace said it would petition the Russian Prosecutor General's office to investigate "a possible concealment of a radiation accident" and check whether public health was sufficiently protected.

Ruthenium-106, which is sometimes created as a product of nuclear fission, is a stable radioactive isotope of Ruthenium, a naturally occurring metal related to platinum.

A spokesman for Rosatom told Sky News: "Rosatom categorically confirms there have been no unreported accidents or reportable events on any of its nuclear sites. It also confirms that the recent Ru-106 emission which is being reported is not linked to any Rosatom site.

"Reports of high Ru-106 levels show that the highest concentrations are in areas outside of Russian territory.

"Recent comment may stem from a misreading of yesterday's statement from Russian meteorology service Rosgidromet, confirming relatively high levels of Ru-106 in the air some parts of Russia.

"The highest reported readings in the town of Argayash (Chelyabinsk Oblast) are still much lower than equivalent readings taken in Bucharest: 76 mBq/m3 compared to the one in Bucharest (Romania) of 145 mBq/m3, according to the IAEA.

"Rosatom is committed to the highest standards of transparency and is working closely with the IAEA and other international experts to identify the potential source of the emission."